[OOTB-hive] Any thoughts on OOTBee owning projects or OOTBee access to Maven Central

Ian Wright tech at wrighting.org
Fri Nov 11 13:47:54 GMT 2016


Hi,

I agree that it's useful to have dependencies available on Maven Central.

Under some circumstances you can use jitpack.io as an alternative.

What does ownership of projects imply re ongoing maintenance and 
support? - e.g. if the owner of a useful project leaves the Alfresco 
community

The related question I actually wanted to raise here is the use of the 
ootb namespace prefix.

Not pointing any fingers but I know of at least one project I was 
thinking of using that has a content model with a namespace prefix of ootb

There's an obvious risk of conflict here so perhaps there should be some 
guidelines

Regards,

Ian
On 08/11/16 09:38, Tahir Malik wrote:
> Sorry all I was on a well deserved vacation so couldn't reply.
>
> I'm always in for a OOTB github. I want to add my own project(s), my 
> own patches to it as well (I guess there was a mailing about patches 
> which didn't really fly off).
> I probably want to merge my community admin-console with the 
> support-tools done at the Hackaton so untill it isn't a general OOTB 
> project, I probably won't :P.
> I only use Maven when needed, so no opinion here.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Andrea Barisone
> *Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2016 7:44PM
> *To:* Axel Faust, Jeff Potts
> *Cc:* Ootb-hive
> *Subject:* Re: [OOTB-hive] Any thoughts on OOTBee owning projects or 
> OOTBee access to Maven Central
> Hi all, I completely agree with Jeff because it is easier to have many 
> dependencies hosted on Maven Central, for ease of use. I've 
> experienced myself some difficulties and a lot of time spent to have 
> Alfresco dependencies mirrored on our internal Nexus, since for 
> security reasons we can't directly access external repositories. 
> Regards, Andrea
>
> Il giorno lun 7 nov 2016 alle 19:36 Jeff Potts <jeffpotts01 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:jeffpotts01 at gmail.com>> ha scritto:
>
>     I recently published several of my add-ons to Maven Central for
>     that reason. It's just easier for people to consume.
>
>     Jeff
>
>     On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Axel Faust
>     <axel.faust.g at googlemail.com <mailto:axel.faust.g at googlemail.com>>
>     wrote:
>
>         Hello Angel,
>
>         thanks for the reaction. Maven Central would be important to
>         ensure you can simply use Alfresco SDK without needing to add
>         any custom repositories. Alfresco SDK - as far as I know -
>         only provides the Alfresco artifacts repository as a custom
>         repository, and any AMPs / JARs not available via this
>         repository or Maven Central can not be included in builds
>         unless a user manually adds a <repository> tag to their
>         project POM.
>
>         Regards
>         Axel
>
>         On 7 November 2016 at 19:25, Angel Borroy
>         <angel.borroy at keensoft.es <mailto:angel.borroy at keensoft.es>>
>         wrote:
>
>             Hi, all
>
>             Sorry, those messages are buried down hundreds of
>             reminders and tasks…
>
>             In my opinion, it’s a nice idea to have an OOTBee github
>             repository with contributed projects. I’ll include my own
>             under this structure.
>
>             Related to Maven Central… I don’t see the point of having
>             it published there, maybe because I’m using Alfresco SDK.
>             Which are the advantages to have artifacts published?
>
>             Thanks and sorry for my delay.
>
>             Cheers,
>
>             Angel Borroy
>             keen*soft*
>
>             email: angel.borroy at keensoft.es
>             <mailto:angel.borroy at keensoft.es>
>             web: http://www.keensoft.es <http://www.keensoft.es/>
>             móvil: +34 655 47 47 55 <tel:%2B34%20655%2047%2047%2055>
>
>             CONFIDENCIALIDAD:
>
>             La presente comunicación y, en su caso, los ficheros que
>             lleve adjuntos, pertenecen exclusivamente a las personas a
>             las que va dirigido y puede contener información
>             confidencial. Si usted no es el destinatario de este
>             mensaje (o la persona responsable de su entrega),
>             considérese advertido de que lo ha recibido por error y
>             que cualquier uso, difusión, reenvío o copia están
>             prohibidos legalmente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
>             error, por favor notifíquelo al remitente y proceda a
>             destruirlo inmediatamente.
>
>             This message and the attached documents may contain
>             privileged/confidential information and intended solely
>             for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If
>             you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for
>             delivery of the message to such a person) be advised that
>             you have received this message in error and that any use,
>             dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this
>             e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>             message in error please notify it to the sender and
>             destroy it immediately.
>
>
>             El 7 de noviembre de 2016 a las 19:21:38, Axel Faust
>             (axel.faust.g at googlemail.com
>             <mailto:axel.faust.g at googlemail.com>) escribió:
>
>>             Hello all,
>>
>>             in October I asked about comments / thoughts on two
>>             topics that might be relevant to handle for the Order of
>>             the Bee:
>>             1) The question of "if" and "how" projects could be owned
>>             by OOTBee / be transferred to it
>>             (https://xtreamlab.net/pipermail/ootb-hive/2016-October/000906.html)
>>             2) OOTBee publishing artifacts to Maven Central and how
>>             that should be handled
>>             (https://xtreamlab.net/pipermail/ootb-hive/2016-October/000907.html)
>>
>>             There has been zero feedback which can either mean that
>>             there is no interest in doing any of it at all, or that
>>             there is perfect agreement with everything that I
>>             suggested / put forward. It is difficult to judge which
>>             one is true though I tend to assume the former rather
>>             than the latter.
>>
>>             So - a friendly reminder for anyone that may have
>>             something to add / discuss.
>>
>>             Regards
>>             Axel
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             OOTB-hive mailing list
>>             OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net <mailto:OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net>
>>             http://www.xtreamlab.net/mailman/listinfo/ootb-hive
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         OOTB-hive mailing list
>         OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net <mailto:OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net>
>         http://www.xtreamlab.net/mailman/listinfo/ootb-hive
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OOTB-hive mailing list
>     OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net <mailto:OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net>
>     http://www.xtreamlab.net/mailman/listinfo/ootb-hive
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OOTB-hive mailing list
> OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net
> http://www.xtreamlab.net/mailman/listinfo/ootb-hive
>
>
>
> Follow Contezza on LinkedIn 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/contezza-informatiemanagement> or 
> Twitter <https://twitter.com/contezzaim>!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OOTB-hive mailing list
> OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net
> http://www.xtreamlab.net/mailman/listinfo/ootb-hive

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.xtreamlab.net/pipermail/ootb-hive/attachments/20161111/3140b80c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the OOTB-hive mailing list