[OOTB-infra] Live showcase

[Martin Cosgrave]

Not sure I'm following the logic; we probably want the VMs to be 
independently addressable from the internet even if they go through 1:1 
NAT in pfsense

On 16/10/14 18:42, Heiko Robert wrote:
> Having a subnet is nice to have but I don't see the need for the VMs 
> since their network interface shouldn't exposed directly to the 
> internet. We learned to be very restrictive since the hosters public 
> IPs are attacked all the time. So having only one firewall / reverse 
> proxy is much easier to maintain/monitor and to make secure than every 
> new VM which will be naked in the war zone ...