[OOTB-hive] Introducing BeeCon

[Boriss Mejias]

+1 for BeeCon. Thanks a lot for the name suggestion Richard. That brand it
as being organized by the Order, but it's not the Order's conference...
it's the bee's conference, including the whole community, not just the
members of the Order.

- EventBrite sounds good to me.
- For the place, if I manage to get CIRB to host the event, a big part of
the cost will be reduced, and we don't sell Alfresco, so that reduces the
commercial interests too.

that's it for now. I'm glad to see al the interest from the rest.
cheers
Boriss

On 7 May 2015 at 17:37, El Gigantes <el_gigantes at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

> +1 on BeeCon. I think that’s already stuck by now.
>
> Regarding the venue I would think that the deciding factor should be:
> 1 - Accessibility. Can we get there easily and reasonably cheaply
> 2 - Cost. Can I afford to stay for the 2/3/4 days such that I can
> participate in the whole event?
> With this consideration, I like Angel’s suggestion about Zaragoza.
> I think every city in Europe has a low cost airline that serves either
> Barcelona/Madrid and the train service
> does seem to be regular and cheap enough to make it a worthwhile
> destination (http://www.renfe.com/).
>
> In terms of registration I am sold on Jeff’s suggestion to use the
> EventBrite service. I have bought tickets to events
> from this service and it seems fairly reliable and easy to use, given the
> validation process at the doors to the events.
> It keeps it simple and we can forge ahead with other important tasks to
> make this BeeCon happen.
>
> Regarding the ticket prices I think we ought to decide that based on the
> amount of sponsorship we can guarantee before
> ticket sales open.
>
> _________________________________________
> If all else fails... compromise.
>
> Lanre Abiwon
>
>
>
> On 7 May 2015, at 06:41, Richard Esplin <richard.esplin at alfresco.com>
> wrote:
>
> I agree with all of the above.
>
> There are a few "conference management sites in a box" open source
> projects.
> I'm sure we could set one up without too much trouble.
>
> As for usage of the trademark, I believe that these are the relevant
> paragraphs from the Trademark Guidelines and Policies:
>
> "Building on Alfresco or for Alfresco. If you are producing new software
> that
> is intended for use with or on Alfresco, you may use the Trademark in a
> way
> which indicates the intent of your product. For example, if you are
> developing
> a backup tool for Alfresco, acceptable project titles would be "Backup and
> Recovery for Alfresco" or "Alfresco Based Backup Tool". We would strongly
> discourage, and likely would consider to be problematic, a name such as
> “Alfresco Backup”, “AlfBackup”, “Backfresco”, etc. Furthermore, you may
> not
> use the Trademarks in a way which implies an endorsement where that
> doesn't
> exist, or which attempts to unfairly or confusingly capitalize on the
> goodwill
> or brand of the project.
>
> "Commentary and parody. The Alfresco trademarks are designed to cover use
> of a
> mark to imply origin or endorsement by the project. When a user downloads
> something called Alfresco, they should know it comes from the Alfresco
> project. This helps Alfresco build a reputation that will not be damaged
> by
> confusion around what is, and isn't, Alfresco. Using the trademarks in your
> discussion, commentary, criticism or parody, in ways that unequivocally do
> not
> imply endorsement, is permissible. Anyone is free to write articles,
> create
> websites, blog about, or talk about Alfresco -- as long as it's clear to
> everyone -- including people completely unfamiliar with Alfresco -- that
> they
> are simply referring to Alfresco and in no way speaking for Alfresco, or
> the
> Alfresco project.
>
> "We reserve the right to review all usage within the open source
> community,
> and to object to any usage that appears to overstep the bounds of
> discussion
> and good-faith non-commercial development. In any event, once a project
> has
> left the open source project phase or otherwise become a commercial
> project,
> this policy does not authorize any use of the Trademarks in connection to
> that
> project."
>
> I think "BeeCon: The Independently-Organized Alfresco Community
> Conference"
> meets both the letter and spirit of this policy.
>
> Richard
>
> On Wednesday, May 06, 2015 21:25:20 Jeff Potts wrote:
>
> I like all of your suggestions, Richard. Especially the crowd-sourced
> session selection as that is one of the more time-consuming activities that
> goes into planning.
>
> On the web site and registration, I would suggest keeping this as simple as
> humanly possible with low emphasis on marketing/polish and high emphasis on
> simplicity and cost reduction (or elimination). Sites like Eventbrite
> should be used for registration, for example, as they offer a low cost
> solution that includes an on-site ticket scanning app.
>
> The web site should be little more than a landing page that points to
> Eventbrite.
>
> The crowd-sourced session selection could be based on an out-of-the-box
> framework. I'm picturing a reddit style site where each post is a session
> abstract and then people vote it up or down. We can then take the top X
> most popular sessions, and those could be slotted into a scheduled the
> morning of the first day similar to how it is done at an un-conference.
> (Imagine a grid on a wall and then each speaker, in order of session
> popularity, places a post-it in their preferred schedule slot. Once the
> spots are filled speakers could engage in last-minute trades based on
> conflicts).
>
> In earlier discussions about this there was a concern raised about using
> "Alfresco" in the name or branding. As this conference is about "Alfresco"
> as a topic, I think this falls under fair use, so I'm hoping you can
> confirm that would not be a problem. For example, we might want to say
> something like "BeeCon: The Independently-Organized Alfresco Community
> Conference" or something more succinct. We simply must be able to use that
> word as part of promotion activities so that we can reach beyond the 100 or
> so people already on the list.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OOTB-hive mailing list
> OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net
> http://www.xtreamlab.net/mailman/listinfo/ootb-hive
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OOTB-hive mailing list
> OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net
> http://www.xtreamlab.net/mailman/listinfo/ootb-hive
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.xtreamlab.net/pipermail/ootb-hive/attachments/20150507/c4dc40a3/attachment-0001.html>