[OOTB-hive] Status update

[Douglas C. R. Paes]

I agree with you Jan

Douglas C. R. Paes

*"D**one is better than perfect**"*
Zuckerberg


On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Jan Pfitzner <ecm.expert at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> @Oksana: Nice! thanks for pushing things forward.
>
> regarding voting & members:
> imho we should be more open here - openess is a key! It doesn't count if
> someone works for Alfresco, an Alfresco Partner or 'Microsoft' :). The goal
> is to establish an community board that is independent from Alfresco Inc.
> So if anyone likes to spent his or her time supporting the OOTB it's
> fantastic as long as they respect the code of conduct, e.g. not acting just
> to promote his commercial product/addon/extension....
>
> Cheers, jan
>
>
> Sent by mobile
>
> > Am 07.08.2014 um 20:37 schrieb Andreas Steffan <
> a.steffan at contentreich.de>:
> >
> >> On 08/04/2014 08:33 AM, Oksana Kurysheva wrote:
> >> 4. Members
> >>
> >>
> >> 4.1. Who are the members?
> >>
> >>
> >> I added the information about all people who sent at least one message
> >> to this mailing list. If you don't want to be published as a member of
> >> the Order, please reply to this message. If I forgot someone (and I'm
> >> sure I did), please don't be offended, just reply this message and
> >> tell that you are in.
> >>
> >>
> >> I added Richard as a "Candidate". On the one hand he is our contact in
> >> Alfresco and active member of the community. On the other hand he
> >> works for Alfresco and cannot be a member as far as we are
> >> "independent". Richard can become a "member" after he leaves Alfresco
> >> Inc. ;)
> >>
> >> Joking aside - here we are to discuss the positioning of the Order.
> >> Can we take Alfresco employees to the Order if they are active in the
> >> community? What is the selection criteria? Fedora / Red Hat experience
> >> shows that it's ok to have vendor employees in the community. However,
> >> it also shows that it's really bad if the community is silently
> >> dominated by vendor employees. May be we can have two explicit
> >> sections in 'Members' area - 'Independent members' and 'Alfresco Inc
> >> employees'.
> >
> > Ok, so it seems Alfresco employees need to be treated special as they
> > cannot be seen as independent.
> >
> > How are partner employees different?
> >
> > Is the mission stated on the website compatible with Alfresco/Partner
> > employees?
> >
> > After reading the mission as a customer, I would assume to find people
> > helping me with the CE here. Does that fit into context ?
> >
> > Maybe Doug should be asked what Alfresco Inc. thinks about OOTB and how
> > it would like it to be.
> >
> > regards
> > Andreas
> >
> > --
> > Andreas Steffan
> >
> > Achter Billing 14
> > 22399 Hamburg
> > Germany
> >
> > skype: contentreich
> > M: +49 1793903615
> > T: +49 40 23943542
> > F: +49 40 23943542
> >
> > http://www.contentreich.de
> >
> > Contentreich : Alfresco WCM / ECM, JEE, Grails
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OOTB-hive mailing list
> > OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net
> > http://www.xtreamlab.net/mailman/listinfo/ootb-hive
> _______________________________________________
> OOTB-hive mailing list
> OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net
> http://www.xtreamlab.net/mailman/listinfo/ootb-hive
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.xtreamlab.net/pipermail/ootb-hive/attachments/20140808/3401359d/attachment.html>