[OOTB-hive] Call for contribution: Let's build a comprehensive module of bug patches!
tahir.malik at contezza.nl
Mon Aug 29 10:50:46 BST 2016
I've proposed in the past aswell to create a patch repo under the
It hasn't been approved yet, so maybe we can get that approved and add
several contributors to it.
I personally thing an official Orderofthebee Patches sounds more
appealing than a ecm4u or contezza patches :).
Maybe we can discuss this tomorrow during the Addon meeting?
Patches isn't really part of any committee of the orderofthebee so maybe
make it part of one?
*From:* Axel Faust
*Sent:* Thursday, August 25, 2016 4:55PM
*To:* Lutz Horn
*Subject:* Re: [OOTB-hive] Call for contribution: Let's build a
comprehensive module of bug patches!
> As the original reporter of that script import API enhancement I am
> glad this appears still relevant to people, although I don't consider
> this an actual bug to be patched. A nuisance, yes, which is why I
> prepared that contribution all these years back and which is also why
> I included AMD-style module loading in my Nashorn engine module.
> I have updated my example project
> https://github.com/AFaust/irc-alfresco-patching-samples which I had
> started after our discussions yesterday to add demonstrations /
> support of the following concepts:
> - support for configuring Share placeholder values via
> share-global.properties files
> - support for configuring Share Log4J logging via module-based
> log4j.properties files
> - support for configuring Share addons in a method consistent with
> Repository-tier modules (in a structure like alfresco/module/xyz/)
> I have also added a couple of Surf / Aikau related patches for testing
> purposes (all the above has been tested on 5.1).
> Additionally, I have included the slf4j-log4j bridge JAR in my Share
> module so I don't have to use neither the awkward Commons Logging API
> nor any other specific implementation API (I prefer the abstraction
> SLF4J provides).
> @Lutz: Please have a look if you consider the three "support"-concepts
> I listed as acceptable for a patch module. Opposed to what we
> discussed in IRC, I have not yet created PRs for any of this to avoid
> pushing things some people might feel do not belong in such a patch
> @all: During the discussions on Wednesday we also touched on the
> possibility that such a consolidated patch addon might be put under an
> official "Order of the Bee" umbrella, i.e. the main project repository
> could be placed inside the GitHub OrderOfTheBee organisation. At least
> I consider all the current activities a part of "figuring out how such
> a consolidated patch module should work / be maintained".
> 2016-08-25 15:52 GMT+02:00 Lutz Horn <lutz.horn at ecm4u.de
> <mailto:lutz.horn at ecm4u.de>>:
> Hi Benjamin,
> I've added a GitHub issue for your proposal:
> Lutz Horn
> ecm4u GmbH
> Hölderlinplatz 2b
> 70193 Stuttgart
> t: +49 (711) 912 775-73 <tel:%2B49%20%28711%29%20912%20775-73>
> f: +49 (711) 912 775-80 <tel:%2B49%20%28711%29%20912%20775-80>
> ecm4u GmbH - die IT in Prozessen einfach sinnvoll nutzen
> Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 734004,
> Geschäftsführung: Heiko Robert
> OOTB-hive mailing list
> OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net <mailto:OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net>
> OOTB-hive mailing list
> OOTB-hive at xtreamlab.net
Follow Contezza on LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/contezza-informatiemanagement> or Twitter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OOTB-hive